If you want to go to the next level with software defined radio (SDR), there are a lot of choices. The RTL-SDR dongles are fine, but if you get serious you'll probably want something else. How do you choose? Well, your friends at the European Space Agency have published a paper comparing many common options. True, they are mostly looking at how the receivers work with CubeSats, but it is still a good comparison.
The devices they examine are:
- RTS-SDR v3
- Airspy Mini
- SDRPlay RSPduo
- LimeSDR Mini
- BladeRF 2.0 Micro
- Ettus USRP B210
- Pluto SDR
They looked at several bands of interest, but not the HF bands — not surprising considering that some of the devices can't even operate on HF. They did examine VHF, UHF, L band, S band, and C band performance. Some of the SDRs have transmit capabilities, and for those devices, they tested the transmit function as well as receive.
The review isn't just subjective. They calculate noise figures and dynamic range, along with other technical parameters. They also include GNURadio flowgraphs for their test setups, which would be a great place to start if you wanted to do these kinds of measurements yourself.
Towards the end of the 134 page report is an assessment of SDR software and how the boards are supported. We'll let you read the paper's conclusions but there was no clear winner or loser although they did mention how SDRPlay's closed source limited software support in some applications.
Even if the report made a recommendation, you'd need to temper their advice with your own needs. For example, if you want to work with HF frequencies, you'd need an upconverter for many of these boards, but not all of them. Everyone's needs are a little different.
If you are interested in GNURadio, try our tutorial. We'll be talking more about PlutoSDR soon, but until then you might enjoy this free book.
via https://ift.tt/2yMrMLx
No comments:
Post a Comment